So, how 150 years ago the nature protected because she was beautiful, enjoyed the eye, so I protect them now, if at all, because you can not twenty other carry. How awkward it is our globe!
It's surprising that, according to Schopenhauer, who preached respect for animals (although the source of the violation Judaism's neck hangs), that one is able to Tolstoy, after Schweitzer to violate the life the way we do this. While you want to preserve creation for the next generation for their own children, and also for their own flesh and blood, I think you still have to scream when you see how much suffering man of creation brings cry from the responsibility of the man has always, always carry with him, has responsibility for everything around him around, in our age for wildlife. A good conscience is the invention of the devil (Schweitzer).
But they do exist, these pragmatists, is not someone who argues with the idea that we humans have to live somewhere like it or not - you are very learned little from the millennia of world history? We took the earth, animals and vegetation, but not to protect because they no second earth, not animals to replace and has no forests, which take you out of your pocket and beautiful place could be, but because, and although it has the power to destroy all this.
It will find people who can not argue with humanity or justice as absolute values, but the Right to preach to take out the fittest and the law of the weak, the morally retarded, abolish all the things that distinguishes the human being by nature and equal time but quite inconvenient to do. A René Descartes has actually dismissed one of pain or fear screaming animal as a mechanism that is poorly tuned!
Of course, one can imagine such a claim bad in our times, but too often the interests of the people, people talk, if it is to go to mandatory. Dignity, which guarantees us the law, but requires relentless, and generosity - these are wonderful Ideally, we should get out of the drawer. The democracy that the law on the forced inclusion of the word dignity, must be refined, its purpose is not to turn the reigns mob and each an equal right to use, even to offer to the indecency to make, but free from the mob people, people of freedom and nobility, which the forgotten flourish fallen victim to the decadence of ideals.
We need a new utopia in any event, the spirit of innovation, which awakens the people, their generosity, dignity makes active and intrusive - because the future not the people as consumers, dem wirtschaftlichen Wachstum gehören, dem Markt.
0 comments:
Post a Comment